Aim: Prosthetic rehabilitation of missing maxillary right central incisor in a 13-year-old boy.
Background: Loss of teeth at a young age, especially in the esthetic zone, can affect a child psychologically. The rehabilitation includes advanced options, such as implants to conventional fixed partial dentures. Since the development of a child is not complete, new methods like fiber-reinforced bridges can be taken into consideration that does not affect growth.
Case description: In the following case, a 13-year-old boy with missing 11 reported to the Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry with a history of trauma that occurred 2 years ago. A treatment plan for a fiber-reinforced bridge with a natural pontic from another donor was selected. The natural tooth was sterilized and reduced to the desired shape and size. It was then fixed to the fiber-reinforced bridge with the help of a flowable composite.
Conclusion: Natural tooth pontic can be used as a single-visit replacement option for missing anterior teeth in a young child. Since it is a minimally invasive procedure, patient cooperation will also be good.
Clinical significance: The use of natural pontic is a minimally invasive, biocompatible, and cost-effective method for single-tooth replacement in a growing child.
Raj R, Mehrotra K, Narayan I, et al. Natural tooth pontic: an instant esthetic option for periodontally compromised teeth-a case series. Case Rep Dent 2016;2016: 8502927. DOI: 10.1155/2016/8502927
Purra AR, Mushtaq M. Aesthetic replacement of an anterior tooth using the natural tooth as a pontic; an innovative technique. Saudi Dent J 2013;25(3):125–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2013.01.001
Kumar KP, Nujella SK, Gopal SS, et al. Immediate esthetic rehabilitation of periodontally compromised anterior tooth using natural tooth as pontic. Case Rep Dent 2016;2016:8130352. DOI: 10.1155/2016/8130352
Parolia A, Shenoy KM, Thomas MS, et al. Use of a natural tooth crown as a pontic following cervical root fracture: a case report. Aust Endodont J 2010;36(1):35–38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2009.00174.x
Babaji P, Khanna P, Shankar S, et al. Biologic restoration: a treatment option for reconstruction of anterior teeth. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8(11):11–13. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/10333.5143
de Carvalho MF, Botelho AM, Tavano KT, et al. Biological restoration: a 4/5 crown. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2013;31(4):282–284. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.121834
Srivastava N, Rana V, Pande P, et al. Total crown replacement technique: a biological treatment option for grossly destructed primary molars. Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2021;39(3):325–328. DOI: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_419_20
Khetarpal A, Talwar S, Verma M. Creating a single-visit, fibre-reinforced, composite resin bridge by using a natural tooth pontic: a viable alternative to a PFM bridge. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7(4):772–775. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/4698.2909
Md I, Singh Dhull K, Nandlal B, et al. Biological restoration in pediatric dentistry: a brief insight. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(3):197–201. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1264
Gandhy M, Baviskar A. Anterior tooth replacement of avulsed deciduous tooth: resin-reinforced fiber with natural tooth pontic. Cureus 2021;13(11):e19605. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19605
Kukreja BJ, Kukreja P. Use of natural tooth as a pontic-a case report. Clin Dent 2012;6(7).