CODS Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2016 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparing the Sealing Ability of Contemporary Restorative Materials

Repala R Navya, GB Shivamurthy

Keywords : AH PLUS sealer,Biodentine,Glass ionomer cement,Intracanal sealing,Mineral trioxide aggregate

Citation Information :

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10063-0004

License: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0

Published Online: 00-00-0000

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The success of the root canal treatment mainly depends upon the three-dimensional obturation of the root canal system. The purpose of this study is to compare the sealing ability of biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and glass ionomer cement (GIC).

Materials and methods

Teeth were obturated with gutta-percha using AH PLUS sealer in all groups. The intracanal sealing material used in group I was GIC, group II was MTA, and group III was biodentine. The specimens were longitudinally sectioned. Coronal microleakage was determined under a stereomicroscope using 15× magnification. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc multiple comparisons (Bonferroni).

Results

Biodentine group leaked significantly less than the GIC group (p < 0.05). The sealing ability of biodentine was better than that of MTA, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Biodentine or MTA may be preferred over GIC as an intracanal barrier.

Clinical significance

Biodentine or MTA can be used in areas where an impervious seal has to be obtained. They can also be used to seal the perforations in the coronal middle and apical thirds of the root canal. These materials have an ability to form a barrier during apexification procedures.

How to cite this article

Navya RR, Shivamurthy GB. Comparing the Sealing Ability of Contemporary Restorative Materials. CODS J Dent 2016;8(1):12-15.


PDF Share
  1. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part I. Time periods. J Endod 1987 Feb;13(2):56-59.
  2. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effects on the pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982 Dec;11(6):439-450.
  3. The presence and distribution of microorganisms with nonvital teeth. Br Dent J 1964;117:101-107.
  4. Restoration of endodontically treated anterior teeth: an evaluation of coronal microleakage of glass ionomer and composite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent 1990 Dec;64(6):643-646.
  5. Instrumentation of finely curved canals. Dent Clin North Am 1979 Oct;23(4):575-592.
  6. ; Bakland LK. Endodontics. 5th ed. Ontario: BC Decker Inc; 2006. p. 525-530.
  7. Evaluation of coronal microleakage after endodontic treatment. J Endod 1996 Sep;22(9):471-473.
  8. Intracoronal sealing comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and glass ionomer. Quintessence Int 2005 Jul-Aug;36(7-8):539-545.
  9. Review on biodentine – a bioactive dentine substitute. J Dent Med Sci 2014 Jan;13(1):13-17.
  10. Coronal microleakage of three temporary restorative materials: an in vitro study. J Endod 2004 Aug;30(8):582-584.
  11. Coronal leakage as a cause of failure in root canal therapy: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol 1994 Jun;10(3):105-108.
  12. In vitro bacterial penetration of coronally unsealed endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 1990 Dec;16(12):566-569.
  13. Microleakage evaluation of intraorifice sealing material in endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006 Aug;102(2):242-246.
  14. Intrarifice sealing of gutta-percha obturated root canals to prevent coronal microleakage. J Endod 1998 Oct;24(10):659-662.
  15. Coronal microleakage of five materials used to create an intracoronal seal in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 2002 Feb;28(2):59-61.
  16. Bacterial microleakage of barrier materials in obturated root canals. J Endod 2006 Nov;32(11):1074-1076.
  17. Mineral trioxide aggregate material use in endodontic treatment: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 2008 Feb;24(2):149-164.
  18. . Direct pulp capping with bioactive dentine substitute. Biodentine Case Stud 2012;1:17-22.
  19. Apical leakage of Resilon obturation material. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006 Sep 1;7(4):45-52.
  20. Coronal leakage of teeth root-filled with gutta-percha or Resilon root canal filling material. J Endod 2006 Sep;32(9):879-881.
  21. A comparison of the apical dye penetration patterns shown by methylene blue and India ink in root-filled teeth. Int Endod J 1995 Jan;28(1):30-34.
  22. A 24-week study of the microleakage of four retrofilling materials using a fluid filtration method. J Endod 1991 Aug;17(8):369-375.
  23. In vitro microleakage of Biodentine as a dentin substitute compared to Fuji II LC in cervical lining restorations. J Adhes Dent 2012 Dec;14(6):535-542.
  24. Uptake of calcium and silicon released from calcium silicate-based endodontic materials into root canal dentine. Int Endod J 2011 Dec;44(12):1081-1087.
  25. Porosity and root dentine to material interface assessment of calcium silicate-based root-end filling materials. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18(5):1437-1446.
  26. Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation of biodentine (TM) and other commonly used root end filling materials – an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2014 Mar;8(3):243-245.
  27. Comparative investigation of marginal adaptation of mineral trioxide aggregate and other commonly used root end filling materials. J Endod 1995 Jun;21(6):295-299.
  28. Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 1999 Mar;25(3):197-205.
  29. An evolution of three materials as barriers to coronal micro leakage in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 1993 Sep;19(8):388-391.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.