CODS Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 2 ( September, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

ALL CERAMIC SYSTEMS - AN OVERVIEW

Naveen Shamnur, Sunitha Naveen Shamnur, Santosh Doddamani

Citation Information : Shamnur N, Shamnur SN, Doddamani S. ALL CERAMIC SYSTEMS - AN OVERVIEW. CODS J Dent 2013; 5 (2):38-43.

DOI: 10.5005/cods-5-2-38

License: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0

Published Online: 00-09-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

In the search for alternative and esthetic restorative materials, many all-ceramic systems have been introduced for the general practitioner. They are used as veneers, inlays/onlays, crowns, and as enamel/dentin bonded partial or total coverage without macroretention. This article describes a classification of the different commercial all-ceramic systems and gives a review of their clinical durability. The primary changes in the field were the proliferation of zirconia-based frameworks and computer-aided fabrication of prostheses, as well as, a trend toward more clinically relevant in vitro test methods. Newer reinforced ceramics showed better durability then the earlier fired ceramic reconstructions. This report includes an overview of ceramic fabrication methods, suggestions for critical assessment of material property data.


PDF Share
  1. Saunders, 2003
  2. Relative translucency of six allceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88(1): 10-5.
  3. Fracture toughness of dental ceramics: comparison of bending and indentation method. Dent Mater 2002; 18(1):12-9.
  4. A crash course in ceramics. Available : http://www.bethesdamed.navy.mil/careers/postgraduate_denal_school/comprehensive_dentistry/Pearls/Pearlsa2.htm. Accessed on March 19, 2005
  5. Recent advances in materials for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51(3):713-27,viii.
  6. Optical behavior of current ceramic systems. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26(1):31-41.
  7. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. JProsthet Dent 2007;98(5):389-404.
  8. Mosby 2002
  9. Factors essential for successful all-ceramic restorations. JAm Dent Assoc 2008;139 Suppl:14S-18S.
  10. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of various dentalalloys: Part I--Toxic potentials. Eur JProsthodont Restor Dent 1996;4(3): 129-36.
  11. Three body wear associated with three ceramics and enamel. JProsthet Dent 1999;82(4):476-81.
  12. Dental ceramics: what is this stuff anyway? JAm Dent Assoc 2008;139 Suppl:4S-7S.
  13. Mosby, 2006
  14. Contrast ratio of veneering and coreceramics as a function of thickness. Int JProsthodont 2001;14(4):316-20.
  15. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Proceracrowns. Int JProsthodont 1997;10(5):4 78-84.
  16. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90(5):459-64.
  17. Clinical assessment of high-strength all-ceramic crowns. JProsthet Dent 2000;83(4):396-401.
  18. Probability of fracture of all-ceramic crowns . Int IProsthodont 2000; 13(5):420-4.
  19. Strength and fracture toughness of MgO-modified glass infiltrated alumina for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater 2002; 18(3):216-20.
  20. An up to 5-year clinical evaluation of posterior in-ceram CAD/CAM core crowns. Int JProsthodont 2002;15(5):451-6.
  21. Mechanical properties of In-Ceram Alumina and In-Ceram Zirconia. Int JProsthodont 2002; 15(4):339-46.
  22. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. JProsthet Dent 2002;88(1):4-9.
  23. Esthetic improvements and in vitro testing of ln-Ceram Alumina and Spinell ceramic. Int JProsthodont 1997;10(5):459-66.
  24. Acomparison of fracture strength of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia ceramic crowns with varying core thickness, shapes and veneer ceramics. JOral Rehabil 2004;31(7):682-8.
  25. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. JProsthet Dent 2004;92(6):557-62.
  26. An 11-year clinical evaluation of leucite-reinforced glass ceramic crowns: are trospective study. Quintessence Int 2002; 33(7):503-10.
  27. Strength and microstructure of IPS Empress 2 glass-ceramic after different treatrnents. Int JProsthodont 2000;13(6):468-72.
  28. Resistance to staining, flexural strength, and chemical solubility of core porcelains for all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14(3):284-8.
  29. The aesthetics of all-ceramic veneered and monolithic CAD/CAM crowns. JOral Rehabil 2005;32(10):747-52.
  30. Fracture resistance of different partial-coverage ceramic molar restorations: An in vitro investigation. JAm Dent Assoc 2006;137(4):514-22
  31. Accuracy of mechanical digitizing with a CAD/CAM system for fixed restorations. Int JProsthodont 2001; 14(2): 146-51.
  32. McLaren, DDS, MDC, and Lu Hyo, MDC. Inside Dentistry November-December 2006, Volume 2, Issue 9
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.