CODS Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 1 ( March, 2012 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Invisible Orthodontics: Gen. Next!

G. Shivaprakash

Citation Information : Shivaprakash G. Invisible Orthodontics: Gen. Next!. CODS J Dent 2012; 4 (1):8-11.

DOI: 10.5005/cods-4-1-8

License: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0

Published Online: 00-03-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

The awareness about orthodontics has lead to drastic increase in many adult & adolescent seeking orthodontic treatment over the past decade. The two major setbacks for non acceptance include visibility of the appliance and the long duration of treatment. To overcome the aboveinvisible braces like - ceramic brackets, lingual brackets came into existence, but could not reduce the treatment time to a greater extent. Later surgical procedures like periodontal distraction, dentoalvelor distraction & inclusion of implant came to play. But involved surgical risk. To overcome these - the invisible braces so called clear aligners came into existence.

Clear aligners are a series of clear, removable teeth aligners that orthodontists use as an alternative to traditional metal/ceramic braces. They are more comfortable, kinder to tissues and used for minor orthodontic corrections.


PDF Share
  1. Invisalign corporate website, 2008
  2. (2008), “One hundred consecutive cases analyzed, Aesthetic Dentistry Today 2 (1): 36-41
  3. et al. (2003), “Effect of Invisa1ign on periodontal tissues”, J Dent Res: 1483
  4. Linge BO and Linge L (1983), Apical root resorption in upper anterior teeth, J Dent Res 5 (3): 173-183
  5. (1982), “Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding”, Am J Orthod. 81 (2): 93-8
  6. Eugene (2005), “Assessment of Orthodontic treatment Outcomes: Early Treatment verses Late treatment”, Angle Orthodontist 75 (2): 162-170
  7. ; Maganzini, A.; Shelton, C.; Freeman, K. et al., (2006), “Invisalign and Traditional Orthodontic Treatment Post retention outcomes compared Using American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System”, Angle Orthodontist 77 (5): 864-869
  8. Lagravere M, & Flores-Mir C (2005), “The treatment effects of Invisalign orthodontic aligners: A systematic review,” J Am Dent Assoc 136 (12): 1724-1729
  9. (2007), “Outcome of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment using PAR index”, J Dent Rse 77
  10. et al. (2005), “Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective grading system”, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 128 (3): 292-298
  11. Fetouh O (2009), Comparison of treatment outcome of Invisalign and traditional fixed orthodontics by model analysis using ABO objective grading system: Retrospective study
  12. (Sep-Oct 2002)., “An esthetic and removable orthodontic treatment option for patients: Invisalign”, The Dental Assistant: 14
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.