CODS Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2020 ) > List of Articles


Assessment of Dental Sexual Dimorphism in Children Using Odontometry: A Descriptive Study

NB Nagaveni, Safina Masroor, Poornima Parameswarappa

Keywords : Canine, Davangere, Dental model, Forensic odontology, Primary molars

Citation Information : Nagaveni N, Masroor S, Parameswarappa P. Assessment of Dental Sexual Dimorphism in Children Using Odontometry: A Descriptive Study. CODS J Dent 2020; 12 (2):26-30.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10063-0062

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 16-04-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Aim and objective: To measure the mandibular canine dimension, intercanine distance, and calculate the mandibular canine index (MCI) to assess their usefulness in gender determination. Materials and methods: The study was performed on 60 boys and 60 girls. Impressions of both the arches were made using alginate material, poured in dental stone, and was allowed to set and then the cast bases were made with dental plaster. A digital Vernier caliper was used for obtaining the measurements. The intermolar arch width, intercanine width, and MCI were calculated. Sexual dimorphism was calculated using the formula given by Garn and Lewis. The data were statistically analyzed using the unpaired “t” test. Results: There was no statistical significance seen in the mandibular intermolar and intercanine distance between the two groups. The MCI between males and females showed a statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Intermolar distance, intercanine distance, and MCI can be used as an alternative tool for sex determination as an inexpensive and alternative method. Clinical significance: The first study in itself to determine gender in the pediatric population in the city of Davangere, India.

PDF Share
  1. Rajendran R, Sivapathasundharam B, ed. Shafer's textbook of oral pathology. 7th ed., New Delhi: Elsevier; 2012. p. 879.
  2. Deebaei A, Moghaddam HF, Delkhosh P. The statistical analysis of application of teeth in forensic odontology center. Pak J Med Sci 2008;24:48–51.
  3. Gupta B, Gupta M. Sex identification in forensic odontology - a review of various methodology. Int J Forensic Odontol 2016;1(1):9–13. DOI: 10.4103/2542-5013.185693.
  4. Lund H, Mörnstad H. Gender determination by odontometrics in a Swedish population. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1999;17:30–34.
  5. Manchanda AS, Narang RS, Kahlon SS, et al. Diagonal tooth measurements in sex assessment: a study on North Indian population. J Forensic Den Sci 2015;7(2):0975–1475.
  6. Syed MA, Selarka B, Tarsariya V. Sexual dimorphism in permanent maxillary and mandibular canines and intermolar arch width: endemic study. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2015;27(3):405–411. DOI: 10.4103/0972-1363.170473.
  7. Amina M, Bano K, Babu Y. Comparison of intercanine and intermolar width of the maxilla as an aid in gender determination: a preliminary study. Drug Invention Today 2018;10(3).
  8. Sherfudhin H, Abdullah MA, Khan N. A cross-sectional study of canine dimorphism in establishing sex identity: comparison of two statistical methods. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23(9):627–631. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1996.00406.x.
  9. Acharya AB, Mainali S. Univariate sex dimorphism in the Nepalese dentition and the use of discriminant functions in gender assessment. Forensic Sci Int 2007;173(1):47–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.01.024.
  10. Vahanwahal SP, Parekh DK. Study of lip prints as an aid to forensic methodology. J Ind Dent Assoc 2000;17(1):12–18.
  11. Vodanović M, Demo Ž, Njemirovskij V, et al. Odontometrics: a useful method for sex determination in an archaeological skeletal population. J Archaeol Sci 2007;34(6):905–913. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.09.004.
  12. Işcan MY, Kedici PS. Sexual variation in bucco-lingual dimensions in Turkish dentition. Forensic Sci Int 2003;137(2–3):160–164. DOI: 10.1016/S0379-0738(03)00349-9.
  13. Anderson DL, Thompson GW. Interrelationships and sex differences of dental and skeletal measurements. J Dent Res 1973;52(3):431–438. DOI: 10.1177/00220345730520030701.
  14. Kapila R, Nagesh KS, Iyengar AR, et al. Sexual dimorphism in human mandibular canines: a radiomorphometric study in South Indian population. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2011;5:51–54.
  15. Gorea RK, Sharma M. Odontometric study of canines of Indian population for sex determination. J Indo Pac Acad Forensic Odontol 2010;1:34–37.
  16. Reddy VM, Saxena S, Bansal P. Mandibular canine index as a sex determinant: a study on population of western Uttar Pradesh. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2008;12(2):56–59. DOI: 10.4103/0973-029X.44577.
  17. Acharya AB, Mainali S. Limitations of the mandibular canine index in sex assessment. J Forensic Leg Med 2009;16(2):67–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2008.08.005.
  18. Acharya AB, Angadi PV, Prabhu S, et al. Validity of the mandibular canine index (MCI) in sex prediction: reassessment in an Indian sample. Forensic Sci Int 2011;204(1-3):207. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010. 08.002.
  19. Boaz K, Gupta C. Dimorphism in human maxillary and mandibular canines in establishment of gender. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1(1):42–44. DOI: 10.4103/0974-2948.50889.
  20. Sonika V, Harshaminder K, Madhushankari GS, et al. Sexual dimorphism in the permanent maxillary first molar: a study of the Haryana population (India). J Forensic Odontostomatol 2011;29: 37–43.
  21. Kaushal S, Chhabra U, Aggarwal B, et al. Significance of mesiodistal diameters of the mandibular permanent canine in sexual dimorphism. J Punjab Acad Forensic Med Toxicol 2008;8:22–25.
  22. Nair P, Rao BB, Annigeri RG. A study of tooth size, symmetry and sexual dimorphism. J Forensic Med Toxicol 1999;16:10–13.
  23. Ghose LJ, Baghdady VS. Analysis of the Iraqi dentition. Mesiodistal crown diameters of permanent teeth. J Dent Res 1979;58(3):1047–1054. DOI: 10.1177/00220345790580030301.
  24. Lysell L, Myrberg N. Mesiodistal tooth size in the deciduous and permanent dentitions. Eur J Orthod 1982;4(2):113–122. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/4.2.113.
  25. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Abdallah EM, et al. Comparisons of mesiodistal and buccolingual crown dimensions of the permanent teeth in three populations from Egypt, Mexico, and the United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96(5):416–422. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90326-0.
  26. Muller M, Lupi-Pegurier L, Quatrehomme G, et al. Odontometrical method useful in determining gender and dental alignment. Forensic Sci Int 2001;121(3):194–197. DOI: 10.1016/S0379-0738(01) 00399-1.
  27. Knott VB. Longitudinal study of dental arch widths at four stages of dentition. Angle Orthod 1972;42:387–395.
  28. Sillman JM. Dimensional changes of the dental arches: longitudinal study from birth to 25 years. Am J Orthod 1964;50(11):824–842. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(64)90040-5.
  29. Cassidy KM, Harris EF, Tolley EA, et al. Genetic influence on dental arch form in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 1998;68:445–454.
  30. Lux CJ, Conradt C, Burden D, et al. Transverse development of the craniofacial skeleton and dentition between 7 and 15 years of age—a longitudinal postero-anterior cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod 2004;26(1):31–42. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/26.1.31.
  31. Lux CJ, Conradt C, Burden D, et al. Dental arch width and mandibular-maxillary base widths in Class II malocclusion between early mixed and permanent dentitions. Angle Orthod 2003;73:674–685.
  32. Moorrees CFA, Reed RB. Changes in dental arch dimensions expressed on the basis of tooth eruption as a measure of biologic age. J Dent Res 1965;44(1):129–141. DOI: 10.1177/00220345650440010601.
  33. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Treder J, et al. Arch width changes from 6 weeks to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111(4):401–409. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)80022-4.
  34. Moyers RE, Van der Linden FPGM, Riolo ML, et al. Standards of human occlusal development. Monograph 5. Craniofacial growth series. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan; 1976.
  35. Alvaran N, Roldan SI, Buschang PH. Maxillary and mandibular arch widths of Colombians. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135(5):649–656. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.023.
  36. Hashim HA, Murshid ZA. Mesio-distal tooth width – A comparison between Saudi males and females. Egypt Dent J 1993;39(1):343–346.
  37. Lew KK, Keng SB. Anterior crown dimensions and relationship in an ethnic Chinese population with normal occlusions. Aust Orthod J 1991;12(2):105–109.
  38. Kumar N, Rao G, Rao NN, et al. Mandibular canine index - A clue for establishing sex identity. Forensic Sci Int 1989;42(1):249–254.
  39. Bishara SE, Treder JE, Damon P, et al. Changes in the dental arches and dentition between 25 and 45 years of age. Angle Orthod 1996;66(6):417–422.
  40. Rai B, Kaur J, Dhattarwal SK, et al. Changing maxillary and mandibular inter-canine and inter-molar distance between 8 to 20 years: male and female. Internet J Forensic Sci 2008;3(1):4.
  41. Hussein KW, Rajion ZA, Hassan R, et al. Variations in tooth size and arch dimensions in Malay school children. Aust Orthod J 2009;25:163–168.
  42. Hartomo BT, Adrianto AWD, Anas AN, et al., The use of human intercanine and intermolar for determining sex on natural disaster. 2019.
  43. Gupta J, Daniel MJ. Crown size and arch width dimension as an indicator in gender determination for a Puducherry population. J Forensic Dent Sci 2016;8(3):120–125. DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.195105.
  44. Astete JC, San Pedro VJ, Suazo GI. Sexual dimorphism in the tooth dimensions of Spanish and Chilean peoples. Int J Odontostomat 2009;3:47–50.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.